People talk about newsletters like they’re leverage machines.
Write once. Hit send. Money shows up.
That story doesn’t survive contact with numbers.
So I tried to figure out what the economics actually look like once you remove screenshots, outliers, and sales pages.
What follows is not a playbook. It’s an estimate of how this tends to work in practice.
1. What the method is
A newsletter is an owned attention channel.
You publish regularly.
People opt in.
You try to keep them opening emails.
The asset is not the content.
It’s the list, measured by:
- Subscriber count
- Open rate (often 30–45% early, declining over time)
- Click behavior
If opens decay, revenue decays with it.
2. How money flows
Money flows only after attention stabilizes.
The common revenue paths:
- Paid subscriptions
- Sponsorships
- Ads or platform rev share
- Affiliate links or products
All of them depend on active readers, not total subscribers.
A list with 10,000 subscribers and a 15% open rate often earns less than a list with 2,000 subscribers and a 45% open rate.
That’s not theoretical. That’s observable across public breakdowns.
3. Who it works for
Based on shared operator data, this works best for:
- Writers with a clear niche
- Analysts, curators, or builders
- People who already think in public
It works poorly for:
- Generalist commentary
- “Motivation” or recycled advice
- Anyone expecting linear growth
Most successful newsletters started with either:
- A pre-existing audience
- A very narrow topic
- Or years of low-visibility writing
Cold starts are possible, just slower.
4. Time investment required
Time estimates vary, but patterns repeat.
Early stage:
- 3–6 hours per issue (writing, editing, formatting)
- 2–5 additional hours per week on distribution
That’s roughly 20–40 hours per month before monetization.
Many newsletters publish weekly for 6–12 months before earning meaningful revenue.
That time gap is the biggest hidden cost.
5. Tools needed
The tool stack is minimal:
- Newsletter platform ($0–$50/month early)
- Writing tool
- Analytics
- Distribution channel
Tools are rarely the bottleneck.
Audience acquisition is.
6. Revenue mechanics (estimates, not promises)
These are ranges, not guarantees, based on public reports from Beehiiv, Substack, and operator breakdowns.
Subscriptions
- Estimated 1–5% of free subscribers convert to paid
- Typical pricing: $5–$15/month
- Example estimate:
- 2,000 free subs
- 2% convert = 40 paid
- $10/month = ~$400/month
Sponsorships
- Usually require 5k–10k engaged subscribers
- CPM estimates often range $20–$50
- A 5,000-subscriber list with 40% opens (~2,000 opens) might earn:
- $40 CPM × 2 = ~$80 per send
- Or $300–$1,000 per placement for premium niches
Affiliates/products
- Highly variable
- Can outperform ads with strong trust
- Often inconsistent month to month
Most newsletters earn $0–$200/month for a long time.
A small percentage break out. Most don’t.
7. Failure points
Failure is usually quiet.
Typical signs:
- Open rates drifting below 25%
- Flat subscriber growth
- Skipped publishing weeks
- Monetization attempts too early
Common causes:
- No specific reader in mind
- No urgency to open
- Overestimating willingness to pay
- Burnout before compounding kicks in
The math only works if consistency survives boredom.
8. What’s known vs what’s unknown
Known
- Email converts better than most platforms
- Narrow niches monetize better
- Trust matters more than volume early
- Distribution is the real job
Unknown
- Exact time to profitability
- Which monetization path will dominate
- Long-term retention rates
- Whether the writer stays consistent
Most projections fail because they underestimate drop-off.
9. Verdict: when this makes sense and when it doesn’t
This makes sense if:
- You’re comfortable writing without feedback
- You can publish for months with little return
- You want an owned audience for future products
- You accept uneven income early
It does not make sense if:
- You need predictable cash flow
- You dislike writing
- You expect fast traction
- You want passive income
A newsletter is not a shortcut.
In all honesty, it’s a slow, compounding asset that only rewards people willing to sit through the unprofitable phase without quitting.
Leave a Reply